What is Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald's IQ Score?

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald has an IQ Score of 95/200 on TV Intelligentsia's Intelligence Quotient framework, placing it in the Passive tier. The score breaks down to 26/50 Cognitive Stimulation, 16/50 Educational Value, and 31/50 Craft & Quality.

Is Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald educational?

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is low on educational value, 16/50 on TVI's rubric. Watch for entertainment, not for learning.

How does TV Intelligentsia calculate IQ Score?

TV Intelligentsia's current published formula is round((Cognitive Stimulation × 0.4 + Educational Value × 0.35 + Craft & Quality × 0.25) × 4), scoring titles from 0 to 200 across five tiers. TVI publishes a three-dimension breakdown only when those values reproduce the displayed composite. The framework is published at tvintelligentsia.com/methodology/.

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald IQ Score 95/200

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald has an IQ Score of 95/200 on TV Intelligentsia's Intelligence Quotient rubric, placing it in the Passive tier.

By Jordan Robinson, MD, MPH·Updated 2026-08-22·Methodology

fantasyadventuredrama

95/ 200

Passive

Light cognitive engagement, background-safe viewing

Score Breakdown

Legacy score. Published under our earlier workflow, before the current standard took effect in August 2026. A founder reviewed and approved it against our methodology, under a process that does not meet the standard we hold now. What this means →

Verification status: Queued. · Request human review of this title · Notify me when verified

Cognitive Stimulation/50

Educational Value/50

Craft & Quality/50

IQ = round((Cognitive × 0.4 + Educational × 0.35 + Craft × 0.25) × 4) · How we score →

What these dimensions mean

Cognitive Stimulation: observable narrative complexity, conceptual density, ambiguity, inference, and sustained intellectual demands in the work.
Educational Value: the density and integration of substantive academic, historical, scientific, cultural, ethical, or practical information in the work.
Craft & Quality: production excellence in service of the work, its direction, writing, performance, and aesthetic intent.

Saves to your browser. See your Personal IQ on My TVI →

Why you should trust this score

Scored under Jordan Robinson, MD, MPH

Physician and founding editor. Maintains the adult catalog against the published rubric and reviews the rubric application.

Methodology

Published rubric, v1.3.1

Formula

round((C × 0.40 + E × 0.35 + Q × 0.25) × 4)

Database scale

2,606 titles, version-controlled

How we stay independent. Editorial scores are not for sale. TVI may take on paid advisory or research work, but no commercial relationship buys coverage, advance access to scores, favorable treatment, or a change to a published finding. We pay for our own streaming subscriptions, and no reviewer sees sponsor data or affiliate revenue tied to a score. More about how we work →

The TVI Take

The weakest Wizarding World entry, an overstuffed lore-dump that mistakes complication for depth. David Yates and designer Stuart Craig deliver a lavish 1927 Paris and James Newton Howard supplies a strong score, but Rowling's screenplay buckles under blood-pact genealogy and exposition, and the fascism-adjacent allegory of Grindelwald's rally stays thin.

People & Production David Yates · Heyday Films · United Kingdom 26 connections